[10BELGRADE21] Ambassador’s February 2 Meeting with Serbian Foreign Minister Jeremic: 2010 is the “Year of Solutions”

0
Published by Wikileaks & Bivol.bg
 id: 247459 date: 2/5/2010 13:28 refid: 10BELGRADE21 origin: Embassy Belgrade classification: CONFIDENTIAL destination: 10STATE9661 header: VZCZCXRO7550 RR RUEHAG RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR DE RUEHBW #0021/01 0361328 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 051328Z FEB 10 FM AMEMBASSY BELGRADE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0705 INFO EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC RUZEJAA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK   C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 BELGRADE 000021    SIPDIS  AMEMBASSY ANKARA PASS TO AMCONSUL ADANA  AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO AMCONSUL ALMATY  AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL DUSSELDORF  AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL LEIPZIG  AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PASS TO AMEMBASSY PODGORICA  AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG  AMEMBASSY ATHENS PASS TO AMCONSUL THESSALONIKI  AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK  AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG    E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/02/05  TAGS: PREL, PGOV, SR, BK, KV, HR, MW, US  SUBJECT: Ambassador's February 2 Meeting with Serbian Foreign  Minister Jeremic: 2010 is the "Year of Solutions"    REF: STATE 9661    CLASSIFIED BY: Deborah Mennuti, Chief of Political Section, State,  POL; REASON: 1.4(B), (D)    Summary    -------        1.  (C) During their first meeting on February 2, Foreign Minister  Jeremic reinforced President Tadic's recent statements that 2010  would be the "Year of Solutions" for the Western Balkans.  When  pressed for details, however, the "solutions" appear linked to the  expectation that other parties would largely acquiesce to Serbian  positions, rather than any significant movement by Serbia:        -- Kosovo - Will require a solution that is less "humiliating for  Serbia," including  a continued insistence on Kosovo participation  in multilateral fora only with a UN representative.        -- Croatia - Agreed the election of incoming President Josipovic  presents a new opportunity to engage on difficult issues, but with  the expectation that Croatia should admit to ethnic cleansing in  the Krajina ("how else can you describe the exodus of 250,000  Serbs?").        -- Montenegro - "Truly our brothers, but Serbs are seriously  discriminated against in state hiring and we will not accept that."          2.  (C) Jeremic was most productive when talking about  Bosnia-Herzegovina, saying the upcoming Srebrenica resolution was  "strategic" in its explicit recognition of Bosnia-Herzegovina's  sovereignty and territorial integrity in its entirety (including  Republika Srpska).  End Summary.        EU - Our Priority    -----------------        3.  (C) In a break from tradition and protocol, Foreign Minister  Jeremic hosted the Ambassador for her first meeting with him at a a  highly visible lunch at the Madera Restaurant in the heart of  Belgrade.  (During a subsequent meeting, Defense Minister Sutanovac  --who "coincidentally" was attending a lunch there at the same time  -- noted that it was the first time he had ever seen Jeremic at  Madera.)  Extolling the successes of 2009, Jeremic said  metaphorically, "We climbing up the ATP ratings and we won't let  our rating drop in 2010."  Clearly taking credit for EU visa  liberalization, the EU Interim Trade Agreement and submission of  Serbia's candidacy for the EU, Jeremic complained that  consideration of Serbia's candidacy might be delayed until June.  "March would be better," he said, noting that the EU Council could  choose to act on Serbia's application at almost any time.  In  response to the Ambassador's comment that the next report of War  Crimes Chief Prosecutor Serge Brammertz on Serbian cooperation with  the International War Crimes Tribunal would likely be important for  assessing next steps, Jeremic asked what further proof the EU  needed to demonstrate that Serbia was doing everything possible to  catch war crimes fugitive Ratko Mladic.  The Ambassador noted that  capturing Mladic remained the most important objective.  Jeremic  characterized his recent trip to Brussels where he met European  High Representative for Foreign Affairs Ashton down as "successful"    BELGRADE 00000021  002 OF 004      and said he was pleased with her interest in the Western Balkans,  in particular in Bosnia-Herzegovina, while hoping that any visit by  Ashton to the region would include a stop in Belgrade.        U.S. Congress a Priority, Too    -----------------------------        4.  (C) Jeremic confirmed his plans to travel to the United States  February 24-25 and said his focus would be nurturing the  Congressional Serbian caucus.   Saying he did not need the  Department's support for the Hill, Jeremic requested help in  setting up meetings with the NSC and with EUR A/S Gordon.  He said  he also hoped to give a lecture either at George Washington or  Georgetown University.  In response to the Ambassador's review of  upcoming CODELS Voinovich/Shaheen and Pomeroy to Belgrade in  mid-February, Jeremic said he welcomed all congressional visits to  Serbia and would do his best to meet with all of them.  Jeremic  said he hoped that official visits would continue between Serbia  and the United States "at high levels and more frequently."  Referring to the Vice President's message to "agree to disagree on  Kosovo," Jeremic said he looked forward to improved bilateral  relations in all other areas.        Regional Relations    ------------------        5. (C) Jeremic agreed with the Ambassador's assessment that Serbia  was key to keeping the Balkans democratic and stable and asserted  that Serbia's reaction to Kosovo's Unilateral Declaration of  Independence in 2008 had been a landmark in Balkan history.  "For  600 years, the response to such acts was war.  This is the first  time an actor in the region has responded with legal and diplomatic  tools and not armies."  (Comment:  Serbian interlocutors seem deaf  to the effect such comments have on western ears and still insist  they should be praised for not resorting to violence.  End  Comment.)        6.  (C) The Ambassador conveyed the points in reftel demarche,  emphasizing U.S. opposition to any prospective plans by Serbia to  introduce an UNGA resolution that might call for the reopening of  status talks on Kosovo following the International Court of  Justice's advisory opinion later this year.  She called for Serbia  to work toward addressing outstanding practical issues in Kosovo  and to begin consideration of a constructive way forward post-ICJ  that would not lead to instability in the region.  Without offering  specifics, Jeremic insisted that Serbia would take a responsible  course, fully mindful of its regional responsibilities, while  complaining that the current situation was "humiliating for  Serbia."        7.  (C) At the same time, Jeremic emphasized the President's desire  to seek positive solutions to outstanding issues in 2010 and said  Serbia intended to be more helpful, for example, in getting Kosovo  officials to the table in international fora and in dealing with  customs and judicial issues in Kosovo.  His solution for Kosovo for  participation in international fora was simple, he said:  a UN  representative would need to be present to utter one brief sentence  of introduction.   In addition Jeremic said Serbia could accept  simple nameplates, with first and last names, but no state  designation.  Jeremic did not offer specifics as to how he saw    BELGRADE 00000021  003 OF 004      customs and justice cooperation proceeding, saying these issues  were the bailiwick of the Kosovo Ministry.        8.  (C) Jeremic said he was currently more concerned about about  developments during the pre-ICJ period, citing recent problems  connected with the visits of senior Serbian officials to Kosovo,  including Minister for Kosovo Affairs Bogdanovic.  Bogdanovic, he  insisted, was a resident of northern Kosovo who had every "right"  to travel to his home.  He also said it would be very unfortunate  if Kosovo officials chose not to facilitate the April 25  installation of the new Patriarch in the Pec Patriarchate.  The  Ambassador emphasized the importance of ensuring that the visits of  all Serbian officials to Kosovo be notified in advance through  established procedures, while assuring Jeremic that we were  encouraging Kosovo officials to facilitate such visits whenever  possible.  She assured Jeremic that we were already in contact with  our mission in Pristina about the Patriarch's installation as well  as the February 6-7 planned visit of Belgrade Mayor Dragan Djilas  to the Decani Monastery.  Jeremic also complained about the leaked  "Feith Plan" for integrating the North into Kosovo, asserting that  it would "cause mayhem."  A new reality could not be created in the  North, he said.  "We will behave," said Jeremic, "but you and the  EU have to acknowledge that Kosovo is a special place for us."        9.  (C) Responding to the Ambassador's recommendation for renewed  dialogue with Croatia on outstanding issues, Jeremic welcomed the  recent election of Croatian President Josipovic, commenting that  Josipovic and President Tadic already had good relations.  "Anyway  anyone's better than (current Croatian President) Mesic."  Jeremic  agreed that improved Croatian-Serbian relations were key to  addressing stability in Bosnia and Herzegovina as well.  He said  that the Serbian refugee issue would continue to plague bilateral  relations with Croatia, but acknowledged the potential for progress  on a range of issues at the technical level, and welcomed U.S.  support, including the early March visit of PRM DAS Robinson.  Still, he insisted that "Serbia does not have sole responsibility  for the 1990's," adding, "How can you describe the exodus in 1995  of 250,000 Serbs from Croatia other than ethnic cleansing?"        10.  (C) Jeremic described Montenegro as Serbia's closest neighbor  and said Serbs considered Montenegrins their brothers.  He  dismissed Montenegro's recent establishment of diplomatic relations  with Kosovo as unfortunate, but less troubling than Montenegro's  treatment of its Serb minority population. "Serbs constitute 35% of  Montenegro's population and the state remains the biggest employer  there; yet only 6% of state employees are Serbs; this is  unacceptable."  Jeremic also cited Montenegro's struggle with  organized crime as a danger to Serbian stability.        Srebrenica Resolution    ---------------------        11.  (C) Responding to the Ambassador's appreciation of Serbian  engagement with the parties in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Jeremic  confirmed this would continue, while highlighting the Serbian  Parliament's consideration of a Srebrenica Resolution as a  strategic turning point.  Claiming that the MFA had drafted the  resolution, Jeremic said the text contained language explicitly  supporting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of  Bosnia-Herzegovina "in its entirely."  Jeremic said this was the  most significant element in the resolution, adding that he had  consulted with Bosnian Presidency Member Haris Siljdzic, who  supported the gesture.  Jeremic said Republika Srpska Prime    BELGRADE 00000021  004 OF 004      Minister Milorad Dodik, "doesn't like" the resolution, and said he  planned to travel to Turkey on February 9 to consult on the  resolution and constitutional reform in Bosnia.  Jeremic brushed  off Dodik's threats on holding a referendum to determine Republika  Srpska's future saying, "don't freak out about the referendum, it's  not about secession, it goes more to re-affirming the RS's entity  status."        12.  (SBU) On a personal note, Jeremic told the Ambassador he was  half Bosniak and that he had had relatives killed in Srebrenica.  (Note:  Jeremic's mother is the sister of former Bosnian Federal  Presidency Member Hamdija Pozderac.  End Note.)  Jeremic also  commented that Serbia welcomed Bosnia's new candidate for  ambassador to Serbia, Borisa Arnaut, saying Bosnia had gone too  long without an ambassador in Belgrade.        Comment    -------        13.  (C) Jeremic's choice of such a high-profile venue for his  first meeting with the Ambassador is as telling as his comments.  He clearly is seeking  a fresh start  and wants to be seen in  public as a friend of the United States.  While significant  challenges remain, we should seek to take advantage of this  potential new opening and continue to explore at every opportunity  constructive thinking about the post-ICJ period - which may be the  real test of his stated commitment  to President Tadic's  plan of  making 2010 the year of solutions.  End Comment.  WARLICK 
Share.

About Author

Leave A Reply